<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Statistics Are Evil!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outincenterfield.com/2008/07/statistics-are-evil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outincenterfield.com/2008/07/statistics-are-evil/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:31:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Texas Gal</title>
		<link>http://www.outincenterfield.com/2008/07/statistics-are-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-37635</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d1077806.u46.nozonenet.com/wp/?p=1416#comment-37635</guid>
		<description>Interesting take.  I think it&#039;s a lot of &quot;we&#039;re frightened of these new and fancy ways of doing things&quot; -- because it&#039;s certainly not STATS they&#039;re frightened of.  They love stats, just the wrong ones - wins/losses, saves, BA.  Even OBP is ok.  It&#039;s the new ones - OPS, VORP, EqA, etc. - that give them the willies.

And also, the &quot;we&#039;re jocks and don&#039;t like geeks&quot; factor.  Except you don&#039;t have to be a geek to understand the value of OPS, VORP, et al - just logical.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take.  I think it&#8217;s a lot of &#8220;we&#8217;re frightened of these new and fancy ways of doing things&#8221; &#8212; because it&#8217;s certainly not STATS they&#8217;re frightened of.  They love stats, just the wrong ones &#8211; wins/losses, saves, BA.  Even OBP is ok.  It&#8217;s the new ones &#8211; OPS, VORP, EqA, etc. &#8211; that give them the willies.</p>
<p>And also, the &#8220;we&#8217;re jocks and don&#8217;t like geeks&#8221; factor.  Except you don&#8217;t have to be a geek to understand the value of OPS, VORP, et al &#8211; just logical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soxlosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.outincenterfield.com/2008/07/statistics-are-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-37634</link>
		<dc:creator>Soxlosophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d1077806.u46.nozonenet.com/wp/?p=1416#comment-37634</guid>
		<description>I think one of the reasons for the anti-stat attitude is the worry about authority. Why does Joe Morgan call games? (not a  rhetorical question.) As a former player, he&#039;s an &quot;expert&quot;, and so qualified to tell us about stuff. But as everybody else knows, he doesn&#039;t know jack. It seems a terrible irony that numbers geeks- the sort stereotypically  picked on by jocks- should have more authoritative knowledge of the game, and this is a threat. Plus, there&#039;s the whole &#039;they don&#039;t play the games on paper&#039; thing, which is another way of the players&#039; wresting control from the numbers...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the reasons for the anti-stat attitude is the worry about authority. Why does Joe Morgan call games? (not a  rhetorical question.) As a former player, he&#8217;s an &#8220;expert&#8221;, and so qualified to tell us about stuff. But as everybody else knows, he doesn&#8217;t know jack. It seems a terrible irony that numbers geeks- the sort stereotypically  picked on by jocks- should have more authoritative knowledge of the game, and this is a threat. Plus, there&#8217;s the whole &#8216;they don&#8217;t play the games on paper&#8217; thing, which is another way of the players&#8217; wresting control from the numbers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
