Red Alert! Loud Noises!

While a lot of Sox writers, commentators and bloggers were busy earlier this week freaking out about the non-existent Josh Beckett issue, apparently there was an actual, real, live rotation issue that they would have been better served freaking out about.

The Boston Herald is reporting Curt Schilling could be lost for the 2008 season to a "significant" shoulder injury.

While the precise nature of Schilling's injury is not known, it is believed that the right-hander is suffering from an injury to the rotator cuff and/or labrum that might require surgery.

If Schilling has surgery on his shoulder, it is almost certain that he would be unable to pitch this season.

Not only does that result in an automatic hole in the rotation (so much for those pipe dreams of a six-man!), it also apparently is causing major friction between Schilling and the Sox front office, most likely centered around (a) when and how did he injure the shoulder? presuming he was OK during any pre-contractual physical back in November; and (b) can the Sox void his 2008 contract?
While neither Schilling nor Sox officials could be reached for comment, baseball sources have indicated that the club has at least inquired about the possibility of voiding the one-year, $8 million contract Schilling signed last November. It is not known to what lengths the Sox have gone on the matter, but their threat has been serious enough to create a conflict between Schilling and the Red Sox.

Julian Tavarez could step in to fill the fifth starter's role, leaving Clay Buchholz with the (assumed) planned extra time in Pawtucket -- but the insane Sox schedule in April makes the thought of seeing Julian every five days scary, to say the least. Maybe the Sox will jump in the FA market or make a trade for another viable SP.

EDIT:

When reached via e-mail by the Globe's Amalie Benjamin today, Schilling declined to comment on this story about his ailing shoulder, writing "I cannot comment right now on any of this, sorry!"
EDIT 2:
Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling will not have shoulder surgery for what appears to be a partial tear of his rotator cuff, despite the recommendation of the doctor who operated on the shoulder in 1995, and will follow the more conservative course recommended by Sox medical director Thomas Gill, after the club and player agreed to submit to today's recommendation by an outside medical expert.

Even without surgery, the 41-year-old Schilling is not expected to be ready to pitch until the All-Star break, according to several sources familiar with his condition.

According to one source, the Sox raised the possibility that Schilling would forfeit his contract if he proceeded to have surgery without their permission, and there were indications that the dispute has led to strained feelings between the parties.

There is a provision contained in an attachment to the new collective bargaining agreement that sets out a process in which the club and player ask for a third medical expert to intervene. In this case, the parties turned to Dr. David Altchek, the medical director of the New York Mets, who sided with the club, according to sources.




Comments (15)

[ mouse ] says:
on February 7, 2008 3:17 PM

Yeah, this is the kind of issue fans are allowed to freak out about.

No panicking in this camp just yet, but if Schilling and/or the Sox knew about this during the whole Santana fiasco, it's going to require one hell of an explanation as to why they didn't push harder for Johan.

Truck Day isn't even here yet and already there's a real cause for concern about the 2008 team. That can't be a good sign.



[ Texas Gal ] says:
on February 7, 2008 3:21 PM

If the club knew before the Santana talks concluded, that Gammons report that Lester was taken off the trading table would seem to make a lot more sense.



[ Meg ] says:
on February 7, 2008 3:26 PM

I think they've know about it for a while, and that this wasn't supposed to get out so that they could trade for another SP without looking desperate...similar to the situation with Donnelly last summer.

I don't take Schill as the type of guy that would do something shady such as hide an injury, but I don't take him as the type that would be okay with his contract getting voided for something that wasn't present when he signed it either. I'm not concerned about the rotation yet, I think Buch will be ready to go...but I'm not sure about it down the line, when he gets near his IP limit and others likely get injured. I hope something official comes out soon...and that the worlds "rotator," "cuff" and "tear" are not all in it...



[ Texas Gal ] says:
on February 7, 2008 3:31 PM

Exactly, Meg. The concern with Clay isn't whether he's major league ready (because he is) -- it's that he is not conditioned to pitch 200+ innings and last through an entire season + October. Tavarez can chew up some innings and starts... but not that much.

Your idea that they've been keeping this under wraps to make a trade makes sense... in which case, a big fat EFF YOU to whoever in the Sox organization leaked the news.



[ Liza ] says:
on February 7, 2008 3:50 PM

Oh, man--suddenly we go from having too many starters to having a questionable amount of good starters for the beginning of the season. This is NOT good.



[ fc ] says:
on February 7, 2008 5:07 PM

I have to admit that even though I was against 'selling the farm' for Santana, on hearing this, I did a little second-guessing. But this is why you have pitching depth. This is big but Schill was a clear DL risk at some point(s) this season anyway. Not ready to panic just yet...



[ Casey ] says:
on February 7, 2008 5:31 PM

We got time to figure this out. While Tavarez pitching against that April schedule doesn't look good, it's better than Bucholz doing all that freakish traveling early in the season. Let the kid stay states-side and get a few innings at Pawtucket.



[ Liza ] says:
on February 7, 2008 6:26 PM

The Globe is now reporting it's a partial rotator cuff tear and that, even without surgery, Schill wouldn't be able to pitch until the All-Star break (maybe). This does not look good. He's apparently thought about retiring??



[ Margaret ] says:
on February 7, 2008 7:09 PM

Um... I'm not really panicking too much. Yet. I feel like this is one of those situations where Theo really knows how to work some magic--it may not be ideal, but of course we knew Schil would be injured at some point, and they've got to have a contingency plan. They've got to.

If it was Beckett, I'd be considerably more worried.



[ MG ] says:
on February 7, 2008 9:23 PM

oh, honey. i came right over when i heard the news. thinking good thoughts for y'all.



[ Piney61 ] says:
on February 7, 2008 10:28 PM

I'm feeling strangely fine about this. I wonder if Schill and the Red Sox knew all along but kept it under wraps until post Johan Santana. My friend brought up that point and it actually makes a lto of sense...but on the other side of the coin, the taking Lester off the table makes perfect sense too.



[ Texas Gal ] says:
on February 7, 2008 10:31 PM

Schill posted over at his blog - and he said both he and the team knew about this since the beginning of January.



[ Liza ] says:
on February 7, 2008 11:04 PM

He also says it's not a rotator cuff tear. Definitely a good thing, I'd say.

Also, I wonder what the third medical director will say? I assume we can trust that he will not be biased?



[ Texas Gal ] says:
on February 7, 2008 11:06 PM

I think the third medical director he's speaking of is the Mets' team doctor referenced in the Globe article. Schil's doctor was #1, Sox team doctor was #2, Mets doctor is #3.

Globe article reports Mets doctor agreed with the Sox doctor that Schil should rehab the shoulder, not undergo surgery -- and that seems to match with Schil's blog post.



[ fc ] says:
on February 7, 2008 11:22 PM

That's it exactly - they kept it quiet until after the Santana deal was finalized.

What a day. Well, if nothing else, it sure got our minds off the Super Bowl.




Post a comment

Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)



you might need to refresh the page to see your posted comment

Red Sox 100
online